VivoLearn

Executive & Administration

The GM / chief-of-staff / EA layer runs on synthesis artifacts: briefings, decision memos, board decks, meeting notes, and a relentless stream of email and calendar triage. AI now does the assembly of nearly all of these artifacts well — but this layer exists precisely because someone must be *accountable* for what the organization decides and says, and accountability doesn't compress.

The thesis · AI can produce almost everything this layer produces, and can own almost none of it — the leverage is in reclaiming synthesis hours to spend on judgment and relationships.

Filter stages:

Meeting-to-Decision Cycle

continuous (daily leadership meetings, weekly staff)

agenda → pre-read → live notes → decision log → action items → follow-through tracking

  • Draft
    Agenda & pre-read assemblyAI drafts the agenda from open threads and compiles the pre-read from source docs and metrics · verifiable against sources; choosing what makes the agenda is a power decision the CoS owns
  • Automate
    Live captureAI transcribes and produces structured notes tagged with decisions, owners, and open questions · fully verifiable against the recording, pure repetition, errors caught immediately by attendees
  • Draft
    Decision log maintenanceAI extracts decisions into a canonical log with context and dissent noted · what counts as "decided" is contested more often than you'd think; a human confirms before it becomes the record
  • Avoid
    The decision itselfweighing the tradeoff and committing the org · this is the accountability axis in its purest form — an executive who lets a model tip a close call has no answer to "why did you decide this"
  • Automate
    Action-item chasingagent tracks owners, sends nudges, and rolls status into next week's agenda · high volume, rule-based, and the worst failure is a redundant reminder
  • Assist
    Follow-through synthesisAI flags decisions that quietly stalled or got relitigated · pattern detection helps, but calling out a stalled peer is political work
Tools (2026)
Granola, Fathom or Zoom AI Companion for capture, Notion AI or Slack AI for decision logs and recaps, Asana AI for action tracking
Failure mode
The AI summary becomes the meeting's official memory without anyone verifying it, and a mis-transcribed "we'll consider it" becomes a logged commitment that surfaces in Q3 as a broken promise.
Try it
Play students a 15-minute recorded mock leadership meeting, have them produce an AI-assisted decision log and action list, then diff the class's logs to see how many "decisions" appear in some logs and not others.

Executive Email & Calendar Operations

continuous, daily

inbound stream → triaged queue → drafted replies → scheduled commitments → daily brief

  • Automate
    Triage & prioritizationAI sorts the inbox by required action and flags the five things that actually need the exec today · misfiled email is instantly recoverable, volume is enormous, and the exec's glance is the spot-check
  • Automate
    Routine repliesscheduling confirmations, intros with approved templates, acknowledgments · low stakes, template-verifiable, high repetition; anything off-template escalates
  • Draft
    Substantive repliesAI drafts responses in the exec's voice for the exec to edit and send · the words commit the executive personally; a sent email is irreversible and everyone assumes the exec wrote it
  • Avoid
    Sensitive communicationsreplies touching personnel, deals, disputes, or press · maximal stakes and relationship nuance, and an AI-drafted misstep here is an unforced error with a signature on it
  • Draft
    Calendar defenseagent applies stated priorities to accept/decline/negotiate meeting requests and protect focus blocks · rules cover 80% but declining the wrong person is a relationship cost the EA prices better than any model
  • Automate
    Daily briefAI compiles tomorrow's schedule with per-meeting context, open items, and travel logistics · pure retrieval and assembly, verified in thirty seconds each evening
Tools (2026)
Superhuman AI, Shortwave, Fyxer as an EA-style email agent, Reclaim.ai or Clockwise for calendar defense, Gemini in Gmail for enterprise Google shops
Failure mode
An auto-drafted reply goes out unedited in a moment of inbox fatigue, and the recipient — who can tell — reads it as "you're not worth this executive's actual attention."
Try it
Give students a 25-message mock executive inbox and a one-paragraph priorities memo, and have them build a triage-plus-draft workflow that outputs a sorted queue with draft replies, marking which drafts they'd never let ship unedited and why.

Internal Communications

weekly notes, monthly all-hands, episodic change announcements

message intent → draft → stakeholder review → published comms → Q&A follow-up → sentiment read

  • Draft
    Message draftingAI turns the exec's voice-memo intent into a structured draft in their established voice · verifiable against the exec's intent and prior writing, but the org reads these words as the leader's own — ownership is the point
  • Automate
    Channel adaptationone message becomes the Slack post, all-hands slide, email, and manager talking points · mechanical transformation of an approved source, fully checkable
  • Avoid
    Sensitive announcementsreorgs, departures, layoffs, missed targets · irreversible trust stakes and legal exposure; AI's fluency actively hurts here because polished-generic reads as evasive exactly when authenticity is the job
  • Draft
    All-hands productionAI drafts slides, speaker notes, and anticipated Q&A from the quarter's material · content is verifiable against real results; the exec rehearses and owns the delivery
  • Automate
    Q&A and sentiment synthesisAI clusters employee questions and reaction themes for leadership · summarization with citations, high volume, easily audited
Tools (2026)
Claude or ChatGPT with a maintained voice guide, Gamma for deck drafts, Slack AI for channel recaps, Simpplr or Firstup for comms distribution and analytics
Failure mode
Employees develop AI-radar — three too-smooth weekly notes in a row and the CEO's actual signal gets discounted as machine output, which is worse than sending nothing.
Try it
Students build a voice guide from three real published CEO letters (Buffett, Dimon, or a founder they pick), then generate a change announcement in that voice and blind-test whether classmates can distinguish it from the real executive's writing.

Board & Investor Reporting

quarterly, plus monthly investor updates

metrics pull → business narrative → board deck → pre-read memo → Q&A prep → minutes → follow-ups

  • Automate
    Metrics assemblyagent pulls the KPI package from source systems into the reporting template with variance flags · numbers reconcile against systems of record, same structure every quarter
  • Draft
    Narrative draftingAI drafts the "what happened and why" sections from metrics and leadership notes · claims are verifiable, but the framing of a miss is a judgment call with securities-law and trust consequences the CEO owns
  • Automate
    Deck & pre-read productionAI turns the approved narrative into formatted deck and memo · formatting an already-approved source, fully verifiable
  • Assist
    Q&A preparationAI generates hostile-director questions from the deck and drafts response outlines · genuinely useful sparring, but knowing which question the board will actually ask is relationship knowledge
  • Avoid
    The board meeting & disclosure decisionswhat to say, what to concede, what to commit to · fiduciary accountability is personal and non-delegable; there is no rubric axis this doesn't max out
  • Draft
    Minutes & follow-upsAI drafts minutes from the recording for counsel's review and tracks commitments made · minutes are a legal record; counsel edits precisely because verifiable-against-transcript is not the same as legally well-drafted
Tools (2026)
Diligent or Zeck for board portals, Rogo or Hebbia in finance-heavy shops, spreadsheet AI for the metrics pull, Claude projects holding prior decks for narrative continuity
Failure mode
An AI-drafted narrative smooths over the quarter's real problem so fluently that the board learns about it two quarters late — from someone else.
Try it
Give students a fictional startup's quarterly metrics (including one ugly number) and have them produce an AI-assisted one-page investor update, then compare who buried the ugly number and who framed it credibly.

Strategic Planning Cycle

annual, with quarterly reviews

market & internal research → situation assessment → strategy options memo → plan of record → OKRs → quarterly review docs

  • Automate
    Research & synthesisAI compiles competitor moves, market data, and internal performance into a cited situation assessment · every claim carries a source link, volume of reading is the bottleneck, errors surface on citation-check
  • Assist
    Options developmentAI generates and stress-tests strategic options, arguing each side and surfacing considerations the team missed · superb red-team, but its options regress to the plausible-generic; distinctive strategy comes from conviction the model doesn't have
  • Avoid
    Strategy choice & plan of recordbetting the company's resources on a direction · lowest verifiability of any artifact in this playbook, highest stakes, and accountability for the bet is the executive's entire job
  • Draft
    OKR cascadeAI translates the plan into draft team-level objectives and flags cross-team conflicts and orphaned goals · consistency-checking is mechanical, but targets are commitments each leader must own
  • Draft
    Quarterly review productionAI assembles progress-vs-plan docs with variance analysis and drafts the "what changed" discussion · verifiable against tracked metrics; deciding what the variance means is the review
Tools (2026)
Perplexity and ChatGPT/Claude deep-research modes for market synthesis, Glean for internal evidence, Workboard or Quantive for OKR tracking, AlphaSense where budget allows
Failure mode
AI-generated strategy options all sound rigorous and interchangeable, and the team mistakes a well-formatted synthesis of conventional wisdom for a strategy.
Try it
Teams use a deep-research tool to produce a cited two-page situation assessment for a real mid-cap company, then spend the last 30 minutes identifying which claims the AI sourced solidly versus asserted confidently without support.

Special Projects (Chief-of-Staff Work)

episodic, 2-8 week engagements

vague executive ask → scoping memo → workplan → stakeholder input → findings deck → recommendation memo → handoff

  • Draft
    ScopingAI helps convert "figure out why churn is up" into a sharp scoping memo with hypotheses, needed data, and interview list · the memo is checkable against the ask, but reading what the exec actually wants — versus said — is the CoS's core skill
  • Automate
    Data gathering & desk researchagent pulls internal reports, prior post-mortems, and external benchmarks into an organized evidence base · retrieval with citations, high volume, verifiable
  • Assist
    Stakeholder interviewsthe conversations where people say what they won't write down · AI drafts interview guides and synthesizes notes afterward, but candor requires a trusted human in the room
  • Draft
    Analysis & synthesisAI structures evidence into findings, tests hypotheses against the data, and surfaces contradictions · each analytical step is verifiable, but the CoS must be able to defend every finding to the exec without the model in the room
  • Avoid
    Recommendationwhat the company should do about it · the recommendation spends the exec's trust in the CoS; borrowed conviction is detectable and career-limiting
  • Automate
    Handoff & follow-throughAI drafts the transition doc, owner checklists, and 30-day check-in schedule · mechanical packaging of decided content
Tools (2026)
Claude or ChatGPT projects as the persistent project workspace, Glean for internal retrieval, Granola for interview capture, Gamma for the findings deck
Failure mode
The CoS presents AI-synthesized findings they can't defend under the exec's third follow-up question, and the project's credibility — and theirs — dies in the room.
Try it
Give students a vague one-line executive ask plus a folder of six mock internal documents, and have them use an AI project workspace to produce the scoping memo and evidence-based findings outline in a single session.

Source: Directing Intelligence course field guide, 2026. Tool lists are dated on purpose — they churn; the stage verdicts and their blockers are the durable part. Spot something the frontier has dissolved? Contribution is coming; for now, open an issue or PR on GitHub.